nto the Land, nor, without the like charge, receive the Innland commodities to export again: Whereas, Cities seated upon navigable Rivers far within the Land look like some Noble Exchange of Nature’s own 杭州三通夜网 designing; where the Native and the Forreigner may immediately meet, and put off to each other the particular commodities of the growth of their own Countreys; the Native (as a Merchant) receiving the Forreign Goods at first hand, and exchanging his own for them at the {111}very place where they are made, or 杭州男人都懂的地方 grow; or, at most, going no further to it, than to his ordinary Market.”
Thus the ideal river-ports were those that were situated, not
only a good distance inland, but in close connection with a Roman or other road along which commerce could be readily brought 杭州能吹的足浴店 or distributed, the land journey being reduced to the smallest and most convenient proportions. The advantage was still greater where the small sea-going vessels could be carried by a tidal stream right up to the town to which their cargo was consigned.
As against these 杭州桑拿按摩技师 advantages, however, there was the disadvantage that, the further inland the river-port, the greater was the risk that access to it might become impracticable either through the formation of shallows in the river-bed or because the larger build of vessels in later years could not pass where the smaller and 杭州按摩的地方 more primitive type of ship of earlier days had gone without difficulty.
From one or other of these causes many English rivers on which considerable traffic formerly passed have dwindled in importance, even if they have not ceased to be navigable at all; and many 杭州桑拿生活网 inland places that once flourished as river, or even as “sea”-ports, would to-day hardly be regarded in that light at all, as shown, for example, by the fate of Lewes on the Sussex Ouse, Deeping on the Welland, Cambridge on the Cam, Ely on the Ouse, West Dean on the Cuckmere, and Bawtry on the Idle. York and Doncaster, 杭州水磨iso though situated so far inland, once considered themselves seaports because of their river connection with the coast, so that, as told by the Rev. W. Denton, in “England in the Fifteenth Century,” they claimed and exercised the right of sharing in “wrecks at 杭州桑拿耍耍网 sea” as though they stood on the seaboard instead of high up the course of the Ouse or the Don.
The Romans not only supplemented their road transport by river transport but they sought to improve the latter by the construction of river embankments. In the case of 杭州水磨qq群 the Trent and the Witham they even cut a canal—the Fossdyke—in order to establish direct communication between them. Just, however, as road-making became a lost art here on their departure from Britain, so did an interval of a thousand years elapse before there was any material attempt to follow their example in 杭州丝袜批发市场 effecting improvements in river navigation. The {112}initial advantage, therefore, lay with towns located on rivers which were naturally navigable and remained navigable both for a considerable extent and for a considerable period, without need of amendment; 杭州洗浴酒店 though river navigation, as a whole, did not attain to its highest d